|
In!
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 15:59 |
|
|
Oh boy oh boy, I can't wait to cop a look at this game. I'm going to have to watch close to make sure I keep track of everything! ...Doctor. King Burgundy posted:##vote Rarity Scum post.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
Max posted:##vote Poison Mushroom She's not claiming scum. She's making an awkward joke of casing herself by accusing herself of being scum. I think you're trying to jump on this for an easy lynch. ##vote Max
|
|
#
¿
Mar 25, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I'll say this while I can still be mean: I don't know what Bowmore is going to require from you guys activity wise, but speaking for myself, I expect a lot out of all of you. Don't lurk in this one. It's pure mafia and it's something you will rarely experience here or elsewhere. Town, make an effort. Scum, don't be lazy, make your win mean something other than "lurking works ugh". I want this to be a special game. Help me make it one. Interesting. See you D2 guys!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
TheRam posted:to anyone who's concerned with how off topic this seems it would appear that opop probably did scumslip... When I read that I thought Opop was joking 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
TheRam posted:CP I don't even know what you are man. Two times I put you as unreadable/town and you just imploded as scum. Cpig is the hardest person to read in this community. It's annoying as hell.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:23
|
|
|
Max posted:Do people really not policy lynch players that claim scum (even jokingly?) That used to be like, an unwritten rule. Hi Max, I'm scum 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Let's all claim scum, then Max will be REALLY confused
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
^^^ My face irl EXAKT Science posted:Sorry I'm just very excited to play mafia! This post makes me think Exakt is scum but I can't really explain why cause it's all ~*gut and meta*~
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Hi, Scum, I'm Dad. Why did you give me such a crappy name, Dad? 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:Maybe you're scum again! Clearly not reading the thread ##vote Exakt
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:47
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:It stands for Super Cool Ultimate Master. I'm trying to impress you so that one day, I'll get a card that isn't "yo stop loving replacing out of games, nerd". That was a cool card, it could have so much utility!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
KB, what's your take on Max?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Heh. So what are your real thoughts on the game right now? What do you want to talk about?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:What do you think of Rarity? Fantastic, an SSS+++++ player
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:08
|
|
|
wall monitor posted:Hey thanks. Ok, realtalk this is a bad post. WM flakes out on his vote at the first sign of weakness in his case. He's more worried about what other people will think of him than what he thinks about FV. ##vote WM
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:18
|
|
|
VivaNova posted:A++ Fantastic Avatar. Thanks 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
wall monitor posted:Agh, I hate the 'changing your mind when someone points something out to you = FLAKINESS SCUMTELL TURBO TURBO TURBO' meta that seems to be going on these days You did a complete 180 just cause KB said your case was based on a jokevote. It doesn't even sound like you went back to look at the vote in question.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:22
|
|
|
Opop I will give you this one opportunity to REDEEM YOURSELF. Will you take it?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Ok but only if I don't have to do a bunch of work Not in the least. All you have to do is... vote wall monitor!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Also he's not me This text shows up when I hit quote but not in your post wut
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Opopanax posted:Also I have no idea about the text, I did a ninja to add that last bit and I get it got stuck halfway Haha. I'm glad you agree about WM though. Consider your redemption pending based on further commitment!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 03:08
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I don't feel the same way. To think of WM as scum you have to almost think of them as Meinberg What? How? I'm gonna need you to explain that in more detail. The only thing you need to remember is that WM has never been scum before so he will be prone to newbie scum mistakes.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 09:03
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:That changes my perspective some but it's like they're SO nervous that they're unable to speak coherent sentences. Do you mean that's how WM comes off or how WM would have to be read for you to think him scum? GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Meinberg is like that - he struggles with social interaction, even on a forum interface. Disagree with this, but that's kind of a tangent.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 10:23
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:That's how WM reads. To think they're scum, I would imagine a more reserved approach, especially if it was their first time. It's an all vanilla game. Why would they flop about like that as scum? In effect, I want to see more from WM. I think Opop is a vastly superior vote. You don't think the small number of posts/short sentences used in those posts are reserved?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 10:44
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Reserved in a different sense of the word. I don't know how to describe it and its actually churning my stomach knowing I can't communicate this concept well, but I'm going to try. If WM was being careful as one would assume they would be on a first time scum, they wouldn't probably put themselves out there that quickly on such a silly, weak case. I don't see it. I think your overzealous approach of WM is more interesting, actually! I'm having difficulty relating what you're describing with what WM posted. I wouldn't call what he was doing as putting himself out there, I'd say it's trying to sneak it through under the radar. To me his posts read a lot like someone trying to be careful. And yes, I am taking a proactive approach here! Convincing other people to see my reads has always been the weakest part of my town game so it's something I'm trying to improve.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:12
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:"##vote FV" "I still want to vote for FV" "Oh, it was a joke? Maybe not then...##unvote" I guess we just have a difference of opinion then cause I think it's exactly what a first time super nervous scum would do.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:21
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I think a first time nervous scum would be asking for advice from scumbros and trying to latch onto other cases. Ok, I see your point. But I don't think that's the only way newbie scum would play and assuming scum only act one way is the kind of thinking that allows scum to win.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:29
|
|
|
Godammit FV 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:29
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:That's fair. There is no cookie cutter way of things, but I still don't see that play as scummy. I have a lot of trouble imagining that interaction from a scum perspective. Can you explain the town thought process behind that series of posts please?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I can't explain dumb. Then how is it dumb town as opposed to dumb scum?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:33
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Because dumb scum in this case would be supremely concerned with how they were going to look to town and would likely opt to be "safer" Yes! This is entirely my point! He withdrew the vote the second it was called into question, which shows this exact concern with playing safe.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:39
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:How many games does WM have under their belt? 10, including this one and SA Mafia.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 11:41
|
|
|
diqnol, you're up mega late. Don't miss sleep for mafia 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:16
|
|
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:I came in to work at 5a today! Don't get fired for playing mafia at work
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:21
|
|
|
By the way, Viva I would really like to hear what you think of wall monitor!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:intentional pre-planned jokes and not scum slips / him running away? To me the only thing that really looks bad is him bailing on the thread for the rest of the day. That's straight out of the merk playbook.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:30
|
|
|
wall monitor posted:10 already? Jeez, I've lost track then. WM, what do you think about somebody. Anybody.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:35
|
|
|
wall monitor posted:That's my bad, I tend to procrastinate when people point FOS at me, since I get easily discouraged and such. It's a bad habit I probably should try to deal with. That post wasn't even talking about you 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 26, 2024 15:59 |
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:It's a less-offensive alternative to "lynch". See also: "lunch" and "dunk". I think you'll find it's called plorp now  e.g. We should all plorp wall monitor today
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2015 13:51
|
|