|
ill prolly regret this but yes.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2019 18:32 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 09:27 |
|
The funny part is the server owner can do it for you.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2019 21:46 |
|
Didn't watch any of the marvel films. Except for like, the first iron man? I think? Also I'm quite busy with work so don't expect me to mafia as hard as I did when I didn't have work! (This should really be a given but apparently it's not?!)
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 05:48 |
|
Toalpaz posted:Please quote this post if you're scum.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 05:51 |
|
##vote Mr. Steak I don't like your 'stache. It looks villainous.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 05:53 |
|
chili I like your style. relatedly, toal is pinging me here. Toalpaz posted:##vote AA I don't like how Toal responded to this post but not to chili's read on quid at all. Feels like Toal's going for the low hanging fruit there to me. I've seen toal play a few times and I do feel town toal wouldn't have ignored chili the way he did here. ##vote Toalpaz
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:05 |
|
Not sure I like new Nep meta. Mainly because I never played counter strike. Alas.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:22 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:I dunno about this. The case on me from Chili is essentially a shot in the dark that most people have just been like “yeah could be” about, if it’s even been mentioned, so to jump on Toal not discussing what isn’t really being discussed is weird to me. It's more of a meta case on toal than you, fyi. My gut feeling is that toal was avoiding commenting at all while usually doing as such (as much as I remember town toal doing).
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:43 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:i would like to play, but first somebody tell me what the gently caress a mason does miller gets investigated as scum to a cop, despite being a townie.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:44 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:Mmmmm, not sure I like that explanation from Fenrir, feels a bit like backtrack explaining from his original stance lol It's been about toal from the beginning, scumbo. Your reaction does make me think that toal was being dodgy about commenting about a 'case' on a scumbo even more now. Would vote either toal or quid today.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:51 |
|
The toal meta is that toal reacts to pretty much everything. So his lack of reaction here about quid stuck out to me. And now quid's reaction is pinging me, as well.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:55 |
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I will say, I don't think Yami is making good stances here... not quite full cases. Hey remember that one game where I did full cases day one in that one game and people were ultra suspicious about it? Fairly sure you were in it and one of the people suspicious of me for it.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 18:58 |
|
Toalpaz posted:
Kind of agree on Lupus, as their posts so far are only commentary... but given that there's only two of them, I mostly just want more. Actual thoughts on quid, toal?
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 19:33 |
|
Paul ReiserFS posted:This is a scumpost IMO Excuse me, did you read my posts at all?
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 19:47 |
|
Yeah what you're seeing is made up bullshit.Yami Fenrir posted:chili I like your style. Yami Fenrir posted:lol It's been about toal from the beginning, scumbo. This is not +1ing anything. You did not bother getting a read at all. ##vote Paul ReiserFS
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 19:52 |
|
Chili posted:I don't know you. But I feel like I know you. You are good police. I hope you're town. I'm not the kind of guy to make a sacrifice play, but I'll bite.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 19:52 |
|
Nice backtrack there, pal.Paul ReiserFS posted:This is a scumpost IMO "Yami is just +1ing nonsense!" *Quotes case* Paul ReiserFS posted:You're misunderstanding my point. I am calling your "yeah I agree" on Toal's nonsense Lupus 'case' as +1'ing (his) nonsense. "Oh actually it's just one post that's bad! I just didn't bother reading the actual case before that one."
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 19:57 |
|
Paul ReiserFS posted:What are you even on? You didn't post any case against Lupus. Your post agreeing with Toal's nonsense case on Lupus is scummy. That's what I said the first time, in less words. I am not talking about a case on on Lupus. You're saying I'm only +1ing stuff when I even bothered writing a case on someone who wasn't in the spotlight.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2019 20:00 |
|
Bernstrike posted:weird that people claim to be voting for the idiot but Nep-Nep has no votes??
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 05:50 |
|
Incidentally I just woke up and am trying to reread but honestly way too tired atm. Did read Paul again tho. Paul hasn't exactly convinced me to drop the vote. I still don't like weird as hell case on a single post while ignoring the rest of the post history. Especially not after immediately trying to discredit my valid point about, you know the rest of my posts with "Lol OMGUS." It's not like he even tried to fully parse that ONE post: Yami Fenrir posted:
It's quite obviously saying "The two posts Lupus are making are not enough to get a proper read on, I want more", imo. Instead he just jumped on the first part cuz it looked convenient to him. Anyway I just realized the deadline is at 2 am for me so uhhhh, don't expect me to be present at the time.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 06:00 |
|
Updated reads, as promised: Mr. Steak: There's a lot of prodding others and, well, "+1ing" stuff, as Paul would call it. All the while not producing much of note themselves. Plus there's this post: Mr. Steak posted:elaborating because i have a tendency to shitpost: This post looks engaging but in reality all it says is "I don't have a read one way or the other on either of these players", imo. It bothers me. That got me to check again and especially combined with the +1ing, I do feel like they have not really formed an independent opinion on another player yet. Steak, who do you think is the scummiest right now, and why? In your own words, please.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 16:45 |
|
AA Surprisngly I'm mosly okay with their posts so far except for this one. Anomalous Amalgam posted:I will say, I don't think Yami is making good stances here... not quite full cases. I do think AA would know better than to expect full cases d1.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 17:08 |
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:It was a weaker point where he it was conveyed doesn't explain what I mean. Ah. I see where you're coming from, at least. Anyway... Tommunist: Has more posts than me while saying a lot less. Skipping all of the commentary and jokephase, this is the only real alignment call I can find: Tommunist posted:Im phone posting as well but that doesnt mean i make incredibly scummy posts about what i think scum would do. Funnily enough, voting somebody else over not scumhunting. While stayig away the main discussion. Would vote.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 17:22 |
|
Hmm, those are the ones that stuck out to me / changed the most atm.
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2019 17:55 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:binus because he is binus. I don't like a reaction this flippant, tbh. "Because binus", really? B- is scummy but, c'mon. You're essentially replying to "Hey, please scumhunt" with "Sure, whatever, this guy is scum, because... uhhh...!" That is pinging hardcore rn. Can you not even explain your scumread?! ##vote Mr. Steak Paul ReiserFS posted:“can be” and “has been” are different words with different meanings I don't know if b- is a native speaker or not, but english is not my native language so if anything it's probably on my end. b-minus1 posted:Paul’s “explanation” and vote was loving awful, just like your post is. Notice how I have never backtracked and said I was joking around. If you can’t separate my joke posts from my actual reads, that’s on you. I haven't had time to get a read on b- yet but this post is pinging me as well. It feels way too defensive.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 06:08 |
|
##vote fool I'm not entirely convinced but merk's points are solid enough that I'm willing to vote fool to avoid a no lunch. also sorry for being so quiet today, I've been having various health issues today such as my stomach acting up hardcore. I've spent most of the evening lying down so I didn't get much done in the way of reads.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:02 |
|
fool_of_sound posted:I'm one shot and I'm blowing away quidthulhu here in a sec of the votes stay on me I entirely approve of this, tbh. If you actually are a dayvig I'm going to unvote.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:11 |
|
Nice how people are jumping out of the woodworks now to defend a guy that has been consistently cased for having a very weak content game. :thinking:
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:15 |
|
Yami Fenrir posted:Nice how people are jumping out of the woodworks now to defend a guy that has been consistently cased for having a very weak content game. Mafia edit
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:15 |
|
Bernstrike posted:not if we vote you first! ##vote fool_of_sound What the actual gently caress is this post
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:20 |
|
##vote bernstrike Yeah uh, no.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:23 |
|
That logic is so fake it's not even funny. Vigs are pretty common roles. And it's not even a matter of believing it, it can literally be tested right now. If fool doesn't shoot someone, they get lunched. Simple.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:24 |
|
Explain how the hell shooting a potential lunch target due to consistent casing is antitown. Also hal, I really do not need to spell it out. Just read the last like, ten posts.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:30 |
|
Day or night vig, it's additional killing power for scum that is a powerful enough swing that even if assumptions are at our own risks, it's a role unlikely to be scum. Not impossible, but at the very least unlikely enough that I find the people arguing to lynch them anyway fairly suspect.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:32 |
|
Mr. Steak posted:just caught up on like 4 pages. oooohhhh boy. Please explain why you think quid is very town.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:45 |
|
Fool, I do kind of agree with Tommunist, please do actually shoot now if you do have a dayvig. Give people some time to react to the flip (if your target flips immediately, that is?)
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 22:48 |
|
## vote b- their post history so far is a lot of jokephase, their first serious vote of the game is bad too. b-minus1 posted:This however is a scumpost In response to this: Paul ReiserFS posted:You're right and got me thinking that lynching him is the right move. Afterwards: b-minus1 posted:Paul’s “explanation” and vote was loving awful, just like your post is. Notice how I have never backtracked and said I was joking around. If you can’t separate my joke posts from my actual reads, that’s on you. Where are your reads? All I see before this post are accusations (except for the post I quoted before this one) that never are really followed up on at all. That's just throwing poo poo at at the wall. In general, their posting is also very defensive, and now they are going "I told you so!" Not to mention their RAPID unexplained stance on fool Ninth Layer already pointed out. All of this combined does make me think this is scum that distanced themselves from a kill target they knew was town. -- Anyhow, like I said I won't be able to be aorund at deadline. Good night, y'all people, most of which are probably in the middle of the day currently.
|
# ¿ Jul 5, 2019 23:17 |
|
Bernstrike posted:Earlier in the day Yami voted Steakumms for having a vote, paraphrasing, “because binus”: There is a difference in saying "I'm voting b- because b-" early in the game and "I'm voting b- because they STILL haven't contributed much" near deadline. You're not looking at context here. chaoslord posted:Yami and Paul posting around Bernstrike is so “look at me I’m so town! Harumph, good sir!” Oh hi chaoslord, you're in this game too! I nearly forgot, tbh. What are you trying to say here, anyway? That turboing a claimed dayvig is somehow a good, townie act? Of COURSE people would point this out. Quid flipping town was unfortunate, yes. There could have been a different target, yes. But it has to be kept in mind that all of this happened like 2 hours before deadline, so there was little time to discuss the target. Calling out somebody for pointing out that asking for a turbo on a claimed dayvig is hilariously scummy either way. ##vote chaoslord
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2019 11:11 |
|
Would still vote b-, naturally. My opinion on them hasn't changed. This post from chaoslord in particular pings me as a defense while b- was one of the vote leaders (I believe both b- and xiw were around 10 votes at the time): chaoslord posted:##vote xiw i believe in binus There haven't really been any real alignment calls (or content for that matter) before that post, and even that post does not explain at all why they think xiw was scummier than b- at the time. Following that: chaoslord posted:I agree with this. Going back, fool asked for a replacement only to show back up and shoot a random townie once pressure started mounting. If you’re town and asked for a replacement why do you care if your dayvig role gets voted out D1? It’s not like you’re the doc or cop, which I could kinda understand. It’s a vig. It’s not one of the more “mission critical” roles. This will come down to playstyle differences right? But I can’t imagine being a vig, asking for a replacement, and deciding “the vig is too important to let this happen to.” My thought would be “great now the mod doesn’t have to bother with a replacement”. In addition to what Merk said earlier about this post, this is not only another one of the "Hey lets lynch the proven dayvig anyway!" posts I am still highly skeptical of, this ALSO serves to give another target instead of b-. Pretty much the entirety of chaoslord's content is defending b- and trying to make the people suspicious of him look bad. I don't like it whatsoever.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2019 11:31 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 09:27 |
|
Given that b- claimed VT, they a) shouldn't be this defensive about being lunched (imo) and b) should actually play mafia instead of just calling every vote on them bad with zero explanation and trying to coast. It's not like they've been called out on it repeatedly either. tl;dr: I believe chaoslord and b- are scum together.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2019 11:34 |