|
I wish the Greek Pantheon was real and he was tortured by some poetic torture based on his hypocrisy forever
|
#
¿
Jan 3, 2020 10:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:42 |
|
|
Unbelievably infuriating garbage, how does a functioning human produce this sequence of trash
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2020 23:52
|
|
|
Times like these that I wish hell were real
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2020 21:23
|
|
3
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2020 23:07
|
|
3
|
Stultus Maximus posted:Is there a Blind Squirrel award? fuckin should be, what is going on
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2020 03:07
|
|
|
Cum pass or pants on the ground
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2020 10:20
|
|
|
Actual hell; having a brief, fleeting moment of self-awareness, and being completely unable to escape the strip
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2020 07:50
|
|
|
Katt posted:Romney deserves a smidgen of respect for sacrificing his political career on the alien concept of "principles" He's going in the history books, it's not like he was going to do anything anyway. It's still purely selfish, he's just looking ahead a little further than "will Trump make fun of me on twitter"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
This is just a photo
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2020 20:16
|
|
|
Worst person etc Thanks for collating all these
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2020 21:21
|
|
7
|
Calvin and Hobbes is why I like comics/cartoons and also why I hate them It was too good
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2020 07:15
|
|
|
T-man posted:have you tried webcomics I don't think anyone here who's been on the internet for twenty years escaped the early 2000s without a shameful folder of webcomic bookmarks Why in God's name would we be looking at political cartoons still, the disease is inside us
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2020 10:34
|
|
|
"... and that's why I always vote Republican!" I hate this loving bastard so much
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2020 18:42
|
|
9 
|
mountain of coronavirus
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2020 00:19
|
|
5
|
What?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 00:48
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:I am not talking about Biden. I didn't vote for Biden. I don't like Biden. I explained this already. Stop deliberately avoiding my point, which is that Bors has lovely So pointing out that Biden is a rapist is unacceptable under any circumstances, got it
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 22:39
|
|
tendencies to attack his own side far more viciously than he attacks the right because he is, in the end, a dumb and smug man like Ted Rall.
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:I am not talking about Biden. I didn't vote for Biden. I don't like Biden. I explained this already. Stop deliberately avoiding my point, which is that Bors has lovely This is literally the comic that sparked this discussion. There is no other interpretation of your attack on Bors, here. You're upset that he's pointing out that Biden is a rapist and the Democrats defending him are hypocrites.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 22:43
|
|
2
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:I'm on the record as finding Bors obnoxious about attacking his own side instead of the right many times. This is just the first time someone edited his cartoons in a way I agree with. The relation to Biden is unfortunate coincidence. It's not a coincidence. It's literally the comic that started the discussion. You saw the comic and responded with frustration. This is just cause and effect.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 22:49
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Joe Biden sucks and Bors is a disingenuous hack who's rapidly becoming Ted Rall 2.0. The end. No moral. What is your specific problem with that cartoon that prompted you to spew this garbage take
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:It's not this particular cartoon it's his whole body of worse since he decided all he'd ever draw is his stupid Mad Max world bullshit. His one refrain is that the Democrats en bloc are incompetent worthless ninnies who don't deserve support. I'm just loving sick of it and have been saying so for the last year or so. "I love my dog, look at how cute he is!" "God I loving hate dogs, they're all disgusting. Eugh. Jesus, they sicken me." "What the hell, what's wrong with my dog?" "Oh nothing your dog is lovely, what I was saying has nothing to do with your dog. It's just coincidental. I don't think your dog is a nasty little rat at all."
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 23:10
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Vincent's able to maintain a mental distinction between Biden and Trump, as well as between Democrats and Republicans, as well as between neoliberals and conservatives. Attacks that rabidly attempt to conflate all participation in political systems as moral compromise are self-defeating narcissism- which is the point of the prior Bors cartoon. Did you people all spontaneously forget this entire conversation was launched from a specific, particular cartoon, of which Biden and hypocritical Democrats specifically were being criticized in a concrete manner on a topic they are empirically being massively hypocritical over, in an eminently reasonable and straightforward way
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 23:13
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:No, you want it to be about that, like the contrarian wants the protester's statement to be refuted because they exhale carbon. You attacked Vincent for the phrase "Thanks for this. Really.", and since then have ignored several posts where he lays out his position, repeatedly, in detail. Respond to what they're actually saying, not the projection of your fears and insecurities. I dunno what to tell you man, the thing he was thanking the other guy for was posted in a quote response to the cartoon we've all been talking about. There's been a lot of obvious backpedaling but it's not really gonna work.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 23:24
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:It's not backpedaling! It's the actual position! Everyone is not your secret posting enemy! You do not need to check every person at the environment march for plastic bottles! I guess people are posting and quoting political cartoons in this thread for no reason, and that quotes aren't a direct response to the things that we're quoting. It's my sincere hope that the true recipient of this post understands and receives my missive.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2020 23:35
|
|
|
One of them is a murderer
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2020 19:09
|
|
4
|
Scratchman Apoo posted:Wasn't the author of this one actively going through brain cancer? Frontotemporal dementia
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2020 00:22
|
|
|
Post poste posted:
*newly unemployed, not let out of jail
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2020 21:39
|
|
|
Pants Donkey posted:
Lmfao holy poo poo this fuckin owns
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2020 02:32
|
|
|
loving lamo
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2020 19:58
|
|
|
He could've made this an unironic good point if he had just, like, referred to the ad blitz he promised, and not the actual good thing which is paying off the poll taxes
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2020 10:10
|
|
4
|
cops charging pedestrians, including people eating at a restaurant outside https://twitter.com/AndyJ0seph/status/1310039203212701697?s=20
|
|
#
¿
Sep 29, 2020 08:47
|
|
1
|
cant cook creole bream posted:If Mitch has the numbers that's it. What the hell do they want the dems in the senate to do? Physically locke the room and set it on fire to delay the vote by 4 months? There's a ton of stupid archaic rules that let you do a lot of stalling and loving around, but it's considered rude so that's out
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 17:15
|
|
|
Old Kentucky Shark posted:They only work insofar as Mitch McConnell can't immediately muster 50+Pence votes to overturn them. It only takes 51 votes to change the rules; if you have 51 votes to do what you want, you get to do what you want. Sure, but make them loving do it
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 17:20
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:You are complaining about your own ignorance of legislative history and process. People want the Democrats to fight the Republicans as hard as the Republicans fought them during the Obama years. They aren't.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 20:14
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:The Republicans are okay with directly harming the public and destroying the government. That's the distinction. Stop buying into strongman rhetoric. It's now how legislation works. So your argument is you think the Democrats have been fighting the Republicans are hard as they reasonably can? You don't think there's more they could be doing?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 20:21
|
|
|
skeleton warrior posted:Insisting that the Senate Minority should just "do something" and the SC nominee when they can't affect quorum and there's no fillibuster is just being angry that they don't just magic what they want into existence. Did you want to engage with the premise or did you want to make up a bunch of words nobody said?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 20:29
|
|
|
socialsecurity posted:You do understand the Democrats don't have enough people to block things as the Republicans did under Obama? Let me helpfully remind you of the context that was literally less than a page ago Lemming posted:There's a ton of stupid archaic rules that let you do a lot of stalling and loving around, but it's considered rude so that's out Old Kentucky Shark posted:They only work insofar as Mitch McConnell can't immediately muster 50+Pence votes to overturn them. It only takes 51 votes to change the rules; if you have 51 votes to do what you want, you get to do what you want. Lemming posted:Sure, but make them loving do it Where in this sequence of posts did you get the idea that I thought they could be successful in blocking things, as opposed to just doing what they could to slow down the process and make it more of a fight instead?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 20:43
|
|
|
I think the distinction is also supposed to be between "Chuck's Rules" and "Actual Rules of The Senate, Which Are The Ones That Matter, Because They Were Elected To The Senate" where he did take the rare step of actually trying to leverage them yesterday https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/29/politics/chuck-schumer-forces-health-care-vote/index.html quote:The top Democrat's action now sets up a vote later this week related to a bill that would protect people with pre-existing conditions if the Supreme Court sides with the Trump administration's Department of Justice and strikes down the Affordable Care Act after arguments are heard in November. Which obviously makes you ask why the gently caress haven't they been doing this more
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 21:32
|
|
|
Somfin posted:The rules grant them the power, and we are discussing breaking said rules. Also there are plenty of rules they could follow to gum up the works with respect to things like appointing judges that the Democrats haven't been doing
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
skeleton warrior posted:Except that wouldn’t “gum up” anything, all of the obstacles the Dems could throw couldn’t do more than just make the legislative session take longer, which in 2018 would have let fewer Democrats campaign for re-election while just delaying October appointments to December So you think Schumer was being dumb and made a mistake when he tried stalling things the other day?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 30, 2020 23:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:42 |
|
|
skeleton warrior posted:I thought Schumer wasn't doing anything? Isn't that the whole point of the cartoon, that there's nothing to do, and he's not doing anything? Isn't that what you were arguing before? Let me helpfully quote a post I made earlier on this page: Lemming posted:I think the distinction is also supposed to be between "Chuck's Rules" and "Actual Rules of The Senate, Which Are The Ones That Matter, Because They Were Elected To The Senate" where he did take the rare step of actually trying to leverage them yesterday I think this was a good thing for him to do! As such, I think it would be much better if the Democrats did that sort of thing more. Do you think this was a mistake? If not, do you think it would be good or bad for them to do this more often? If you think it would be good if they did it more often, then we're in agreement about my original statement, which is that I wish the Democrats would do more to fight back against the Republican agenda
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2020 00:08
|
|