|
 Searching for "Branco Hitler Mouth" images doesn't turn up any actual cases of Branco Hitler Mouth. Yet the second image was a Bors cartoon? My lack of work ethic keeps me from trying any harder to ensure I get the authentic look down.
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 04:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
Melaneus posted:
Haha thanks for this. Miscegenation! 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 04:35
|
|
|
cafel posted:Eh, calling out Michelle Obama and the photo involving a well set table comes across as directly attacking the spending of the First Family. I guess if the words government comes anywhere near a personal fortune the money turns bad and starts killing jobs. This reminds me of the "lavish Las Vegas convention" from a few years back that got someone at the GSA fired even though similar types of events are not at all unusual for large companies. For people who insist that government should be run like a business, they sure do hate when government officials start acting like businessmen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 04:39
|
|
|
Is Jewish DNA notoriously recessive or something? If I had kids with a full-blooded, Kirschen-approved Jew, would the kids be like quarter Jewish or something? Does he think that Israel will dissolve as a state if Jewish blood becomes too dliuted? Basically, interpreting it as anything besides racism is really hard. Basically, I hope Kirschen develops hemophilia.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:02
|
|
|
There is a belief that only Jewish Mothers can have Jewish children and Jewish men have to have kids with a Jewish woman if they want their kids to be Jewish. I personally hold less to the idea of Jewish purity and more to avoiding the Laundry List of genetic disorders that Jews (particularly Ashkenazim) can suffer from thanks to all the inbreeding, but that's just me. SwimmingSpider fucked around with this message at 05:15 on Feb 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:09
|
|
|
Rorus Raz posted:Is Jewish DNA notoriously recessive or something? If I had kids with a full-blooded, Kirschen-approved Jew, would the kids be like quarter Jewish or something? Does he think that Israel will dissolve as a state if Jewish blood becomes too dliuted? Basically, interpreting it as anything besides racism is really hard. If a Jewish man marries a gentile woman, then the kids will not be Jewish by blood. This can be problematic since a hypothetical restored Kohanim priesthood needs to be pure blooded according to rabbinical literature so that their offices will be valid. There's also numerous statistics that point out that many mixed faith marriages result in the children not having any kind of faith at all when they reach adulthood. Kirschen is still a bloodthirsty hypocritical bigot, but his concern with Jewish intermarriage has plenty of support within Orthodox Jewish tradition.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:13
|
|
|
cafel posted:Eh, calling out Michelle Obama and the photo involving a well set table comes across as directly attacking the spending of the First Family. I guess if the words government comes anywhere near a personal fortune the money turns bad and starts killing jobs. Michelle Obama did indeed tweet the words "Bone appétit". What Muir should be angry about is that the correct word is "bon appétit". I feel like that's more worthy of criticism than anything else in this stupid nonstory.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:18
|
|
|
It is a pun about dogs though. \/ Edit: Ha! beat you Linguica. Who's cool now?! Huh?? 
itskage fucked around with this message at 05:25 on Feb 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:20
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:Michelle Obama did indeed tweet the words "Bone appétit". What Muir should be angry about is that the correct word is "bon appétit". I feel like that's more worthy of criticism than anything else in this stupid nonstory.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:21
|
|
|
Jay Rust posted:Michelle Obama did indeed tweet the words "Bone appétit". What Muir should be angry about is that the correct word is "bon appétit". It's a picture of dogs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:21
|
|
|
ProperGanderPusher posted:If a Jewish man marries a gentile woman, then the kids will not be Jewish by blood. This can be problematic since a hypothetical restored Kohanim priesthood needs to be pure blooded according to rabbinical literature so that their offices will be valid. There's also numerous statistics that point out that many mixed faith marriages result in the children not having any kind of faith at all when they reach adulthood. Kirschen is still a bloodthirsty hypocritical bigot, but his concern with Jewish intermarriage has plenty of support within Orthodox Jewish tradition. A few caveats: Keep in mind that to anyone that is not at least Orthodox the phrase "Jewish by blood" doesn't actually mean anything other than maybe "Ashkenazi/Sephardi by ethnicity." Keep in mind that lapsed Jews are probably even more prevalent per capita than lapsed Catholics regardless of parentage and have been for hundreds of years (and yet there are still Jews,  ). Keep in mind that the Kohanim priesthood is never going to be restored and that is just fine.Basically Jewish fundamentalists can be as horrible as Christian or Muslim ones, and each in their own unique ways. Rhinoceraptor posted:It's a picture of dogs. Wait. Michelle Obama tweeted a picture of dogs eating, and this is supposed to be a Marie-Antoinette-esque slap in the face to the proletariat and unimaginable show of decadence?  Muir, George W Bush started a trillion-dollar war over nothing. Let a middle-aged lady tweet some dogs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
Lance Streetman posted:I learned this firsthand when a Jewish friend of my sister married a dude from Jordan. Her family in the US was pretty cool with it. Her family in Israel disowned her. Wait, I think Kirschen did a comic about this.  quote:How can you invite an Arab husband to dinner... when he's just going to kill you all before you can serve dessert! (*Kirschen assumes all Arabs murder Jews, obviously, no slander towards your sister's friend's husband intended)
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
loquacius posted:Wait. Michelle Obama tweeted a picture of dogs eating, and this is supposed to be a Marie-Antoinette-esque slap in the face to the proletariat and unimaginable show of decadence? Well there was a nice table setting in the background.  Of course this is the White House, so there's always a nice table setting, and it just so happens we're in the middle of a State Visit, so it's fancier than normal. So Muir and company are mad because the Obama's don't serve the French President using chipped plates at a rickety table. edit: Taciturn Tactician posted:Wait, I think Kirschen did a comic about this. This isn't real, right? I think I'd remember it and it's such a vilely open expression of racism. Please tell me it's an edit. Please. cafel fucked around with this message at 05:36 on Feb 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:31
|
|
|
Dr.Zeppelin posted:This reminds me of the "lavish Las Vegas convention" from a few years back that got someone at the GSA fired even though similar types of events are not at all unusual for large companies. For people who insist that government should be run like a business, they sure do hate when government officials start acting like businessmen. That was kind of a legit scandal though. The GSA are supposed to be the vendor people who make sure the feds aren't overspending on things(it rarely works out that way.)
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:32
|
|
|
itskage posted:It is a pun about dogs though. Ah. I'm dumb. Muir actually misquotes the First Lady, adding an "e" to "appétit" for no reason. So at least I'm not as dumb as Muir. Phew!
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:35
|
|
|
cafel posted:
It's an edit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:36
|
|
|
cafel posted:This isn't real, right? I think I'd remember it and it's such a vilely open expression of racism. Please tell me it's an edit. Please. This is the original. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:45
|
|
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:Wait, I think Kirschen did a comic about this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:46
|
|
JT Jag posted:Doesn't have Jonathan Pollard in the tags, so I knew it was an edit. I'd let this fucker go in a heartbeat if it would stop this guy from making comics.
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:51
|
|
|
The only person hurt by the ACA is Obama's cartoon image?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 05:57
|
|
|
The Suicide King is actually being stabbed from behind by either the Jack of Hearts or the Queen of Spades. Not A Good Cartoon, I'm just pointing that out.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:02
|
|
|
john rule channels yaakov kirschen
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:05
|
|
|
Uh, what? Like, what is the point of this cartoon? Michael Sam will run through the NFL alone?
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:10
|
|
|
pentyne posted:Uh, what? Like, what is the point of this cartoon? Michael Sam will run through the NFL alone? Michael Sam is bursting onto the scene/ breaking longstanding barriers within the NFL.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:11
|
|
|
Berke Negri posted:That was kind of a legit scandal though. The GSA are supposed to be the vendor people who make sure the feds aren't overspending on things(it rarely works out that way.) My point was that large companies are slaves to their shareholders so they can obviously come up with reasons why it makes sense financially to have lavish internal conventions (morale, recruitment, marketing, etc.) instead of socking that money away in an investment. If efficient private companies can defend their Vegas workparties then the government should be able to as well. Incidentally that whole thing has made government agencies (at least the ones I've worked with) deliberately avoid hosting events in Vegas due to the perception of wastefulness even if airfare and hotel convention space is dirt cheap, so the GSA ironically led to the government spending more money to avoid a repeat of their optics.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:15
|
|
|
HOLY poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:16
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:The Suicide King is actually being stabbed from behind by either the Jack of Hearts or the Queen of Spades. In the version that Ramirez took as reference, and of course his own comic, the stabbing arm even has different cuffs than the sleeve on the chest. Seems like a weird detail to copy if you want to make it clear that it's suicide.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:16
|
|
|
crowfeathers posted:HOLY poo poo Ah yes, Michelle Obama, noted doughnut eater.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:18
|
|
|
Michelle eats a lot of donuts and pumps a lot of iron? I have no idea what goes on in Snafu's head while he draws his ugly-rear end cartoons.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:19
|
|
|
Lycus posted:Michelle eats a lot of donuts and pumps a lot of iron? I have no idea what goes on in Snafu's head while he draws his ugly-rear end cartoons. I also like Obama lighting a cigarette with a dollar bill.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:21
|
|
|
Lycus posted:Michelle eats a lot of donuts and pumps a lot of iron? I have no idea what goes on in Snafus head while he draws his ugly-rear end cartoons. But no you see she is both a gross fatass and a fitness obsessed ugly man. As proof, see: the Freep thread, how the bottom half in the cartoon looks fatty instead of muscly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:22
|
|
|
So what Snafu is saying is that Michelle only works her glamour muscles.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:25
|
|
|
What the gently caress is this about other than "there are BLACK PEOPLE in the WHITE HOUSE!!1!!"? Goddang, Snafuguy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:25
|
|
|
agarjogger posted:I'd let this fucker go in a heartbeat if it would stop this guy from making comics. Thanks to Kirschen I want Pollard's parole delayed until after Yakkov dies.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:31
|
|
|
Auuuuuuuuuuugh limericks have a meter you lazy hack, that is painfully wrong. E: "I know you still love me despite my mistake/regarding Benghazi (I wasn't awake)/They'll still give me grief/as commander in chief/but what difference does it make" is so much better just edit yourself a tiny bit Taciturn Tactician fucked around with this message at 06:42 on Feb 12, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:35
|
|
|
Lycus posted:So what Snafu is saying is that Michelle only works her glamour muscles. She skipped leg day.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:37
|
|
|
crowfeathers posted:HOLY poo poo A great cartoon.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 23, 2024 09:32 |
|
|
loquacius posted:
For a bit of both worlds, my fiancée and I did Birthright last year, and at the end of the One of the statements was "As a Jew, I have a responsibility to marry Jewish." My fiancée and I were the only people in the "Strongly Disagree" camp (and yes, everyone joked about it like "if you don't want to marry Jewish, why are you getting married?"). Most people were in "Agree" or "Strongly Agree". The other questions were even worse though. I stayed in "Strongly Disagree" the entire time. We also had to argue our cases and it was not a comfortable space for dissenting voices. Fun times.
|
|
#
?
Feb 12, 2014 06:48
|
|
Among American Jews, dating/marrying non-Jews is a time-honored tradition. In Israel that's worth a scandal?