Go RV! posted:

I missed the last few months of the previous thread, and there's only one burning question in my mind. What ever happened with the DBD spermjacking plotline?

axolotl farmer posted:

I think Ted Rall is just barely computer literate.


$7000 for a computer?

YOSPOS bihtc, Ted.

change my name posted:

I did, but 1: it's easy to overlook, and 2: by saying that "there's only one in captivity!" instead of something like, "we've captured the thing", he's implying that there are more nuclear programs anyways.

Captain_Maclaine posted:

I agree it's probably impossible to do these days, and has been that way for a long time, but I'd argue that at least two anti-war movies have actually been made, one intentionally, one not. Both are from WWI, and were shot during the war itself: The Battle of the Somme, 1916, and J'accuse, 1919.

The former was intended as a propaganda piece, but was realistic enough to horrify British audiences when it premiered; we have numerous accounts of people crying out in shock as troops go over the top and get mowed down, and several cases of audience members fainting. The latter almost rates as a horror film given its use of imagery of dead soldiers returning to haunt/judge the living back at home. Neither was misinterpreted at the time in any way as being pro-war or jingoistic to my knowledge.

Randler posted:

CINCINNATI, OH (FOX19) - The Cincinnati Bengals ticket office has officially announced that Sunday's game is not a sell out, and will not be shown on FOX19.

NFL policy states that games must be sold out 72 hours in advance of kickoff to be televised locally. The sellout deadline was at 1 p.m. Thursday. The NFL did not grant an extension. (...)

Mighty Stalker posted:

wrap it up, public schoolailures
homeschooling is better

loquacius posted:

Also while I was looking for that I found this old DbD, which is not an edit and has a large degree of relevance to the recent trend of Dick By Dick edits.



I swear to God that is not an edit. Muir wrote and published that. No, he is not insecure. Ladies love his penis. Really. They do. Shut up.

loquacius posted:

Sure, I guess I have nothing better to do

cafel posted:

It's really simple. The President is a distracting figure head who holds no power and the American people are a bunch of dupes for paying attention to him. It's pretty stupid.

D.N. Nation posted:

TheDarkFlame posted:

And here is the comic that perfectly predicted the incredible success of the American economy in the 21st century, a post or two after that Rorus Razpost:

MisterBadIdea posted:

Boy, why can't the first lady dress like the common folk? She would surely not be derided as a classless trashy ho by the same people who are complaining about her expensive wardrobe.

Discendo Vox posted:

Here's the other Ramirez you're thinking of:

Internet Webguy posted:

crowfeathers posted:

so ask yourself, is this better or worse than a ramirez arrow cartoon

steinrokkan posted:

Yes, because Dilbert is good.

And he failed at recreating Dogbert.

Allen Wren posted:

Wait, poo poo. Wrong thread for Dobson edits. It's reflex at this point.

loquacius posted:

The sweat is because he's heard they don't do Christmas in Israel

Discendo Vox posted:

Wow, that's terrible. I agree with the argument, but reading it makes me agree with the argument less. It's like an anti-opinion cartoon. It's more than JJ.

Ted Rall posted:

Thank you, Miep. Another defense to my skills as an artist would be how difficult it is for people who attempt to parody me to replicate my style. Charles Schulz had a very simple drawing style too, but whenever you try to copy it, you realize how sophisticated it is.

jerk posted:

1. “Ted Rall, whose ineptitude at art is matched only by the size of his ego.”
Dilbert is drawn by an artistic simpleton. It’s barely even stickfigures. People don’t read the strip for the art. They read it for the humor. Cartoons are rarely just the drawing. The words are almost always the important part.

Fulchrum posted:

He maintained it just fine after Temple of Doom. I didn't even maintain my faith in the Indiana Jones franchise after that movie.

Mighty Stalker posted:

He's still doing this. Could this be the beginning of a my Little Pony Story arc? I figure we'll get at least a few more of these before Chris gets distracted by some right wing blog talking point and drops the story.

Horon posted:

So in class today, we were supposed to bring in three political cartoons and share them with the group and something something.

Mister Adequate posted:

Why is Obama talking about himself in the third person?

Saint Sputnik posted:

Now that's a manly heartthrob in a cool dude outfit, unlike to that twerp in the plaid onesie who shills for Obongokkkare

Mighty Stalker posted:

A lot of people struggle with Muirglish. I've made a rough translation into English but some of the subtle nuances get lost in translation.

colonel_korn posted:

Of course! It was made by an "athiest" after all



Tony Branco, the dude who once literally drew the Duck Dynasty guy as Jesus Christ, also thinks it's blasphemous.

Fulchrum posted:

pope archibald posted:

1983

Not My Leg posted:

You're right, this is much more like Tinsley complaining about his DUI.

Spiffster posted:

We've got Comic sign!
8.

Ammat The Ankh posted:

2

Mordiceius posted:

Vogon Poet posted:

Terror Sweat posted:

Why would you type this? The hell is wrong with you? You are publicly writing an imaginary one-sided conversation to someone that will never read it.

Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:

You know that's this entire thread right?

I Before E posted:

"That the Prez' madder than hell" is just a big pain in the rear end of a line to read. Just no flow.

Tood Rool posted:

One of my personal favorites, but also my worst-selling book, this graphic novel is a homage to/parody of/updating of George Orwell’s novel of totalitarian oppression 1984. I faithfully attempted to follow the structure of Orwell’s classic with a new take on twisted take on dystopia. The threat to our freedom isn’t some totalitarian tyrant — it’s our own, lazy, easily-distracted selves, wallowing in technological gadgetry while the world falls apart around us. Taking on postmodernism, nihilism, the Internet and free trade all at once, this is one of my most ambitious attempts to satirize contemporary American politics.

Apple Pie Hubbub posted:

Mordiceius posted:

I refuse to even comment on this one.